[ad_1]
Another post, gaining tens of thousand of view claimed that the earthquake in Iran fits the profile of a nuclear test explosion.
However, among all this speculation, some users posted counterarguments alleging that the termors felt were from the natural earthquake.
Reports that denied the claim said that Iran sits on major fault lines, making it one of the most earthquake-prone countries. Therefore, natural seismic activity is not unusual.
The counterargument further claimed that no radioactive fallout or other signs typically associated with a nuclear test have been reported. Moreover, the seismic signature, while suggestive, isn’t definitive without further geological and possibly on-the-ground analysis.
A user on X said that the main difference between a natural earthquake and a nuclear test is in what type of waves they produce.
“Earthquake seismographs are dominated by strong “S” waves, while, Nuclear tests are dominated by “P” waves. I think the seismograph from Iran is dominated by S waves.” he wrote while sharing photos of seismic waves.
The main difference between a natural earthquake and a nuclear test is in what type of waves they produce
Earthquake seismographs are dominated by strong “S” waves
Nuclear tests are dominated by “P” waves.
I think the seismograph from Iran is dominated by S waves .. pic.twitter.com/4LFGyaqeFL
— (@503i7) October 6, 2024
[ad_2]
Source link
